Nano Banana Pro vs FLUX 2 - I Was SHOCKED by the Results
TLDRIn this video, the creator compares the AI image generators Nano Banana Pro and Flux 2, testing their capabilities in various tasks like multi-reference handling, VFX integration, photo realism, and text renderingNano Banana Pro vs Flux 2. The results reveal that Nano Banana Pro generally outperforms Flux 2, especially in areas like consistency, realism, and text accuracy. However, Flux 2 excels in certain dynamic effects and deblurring. Both tools impress with their ability to create stunning visuals, making them valuable options for AI-assisted content creation. The video concludes with the creator recommending experimentation with both tools.
Takeaways
- 😀 Retake by LTX is a revolutionary AI tool that allows users to change dialogue in a video after filming. It can rephrase what a character says by simply uploading a video and adjusting the prompt.
- 🤯Nano Banana Pro consistently follows prompts with impressive precision, as demonstrated by a detailed image generation test. It outperformed Flux 2 in this particular test..
- 🔥 Flux 2 is great for dynamic, eye-catching visuals, but sometimes it doesn't follow prompts as accurately as Nano Banana Pro, as seen in the multi-reference image generation test.
- 💥 Both Nano Banana Pro and Flux 2 perform excellently when handling VFX tasks like adding fire to a scene, but the results are more about stylistic preferences than functionality.
- 🖼️ Nano Banana Pro excels in photo realism, especially in creating natural-looking skin textures. It delivers a more realistic, balanced result compared to Flux 2, which sometimes overdoes certain features like freckles.
- 🌞 In terms of changing the weather in video scenes, Flux 2 performs better in maintaining the original scene structure, like in a test where it transformed a Jurassic Park screenshot to a sunny version.
- 🎨 Both Nano Banana Pro and Flux 2 handle text rendering and infographics well, but Nano Banana Pro offers fewer text errors, making it a more reliable choice for detailed text-based designs.
- 🧩 Nano Banana Pro outperforms Flux 2 in tricky problem-solving tasks, such as reconstructing ripped paper with text on it. Flux 2 couldn't handle the text consistency as well in this case.
- 🎥 Nano Banana Pro hasNano Banana Pro vs Flux 2 an edge when it comes to creating YouTube thumbnails, as its designs tend to be more visually engaging with higher contrast and more striking colors.
- 🔍 Nano Banana Pro is also better at handling language translations, such as writing in Thai, as it conveyed the correct text more accurately compared to Flux 2.
Q & A
What is the purpose of the video?
-The video compares two AI tools, Nano Banana Pro and Flux 2, to determine which one performs better across different tests and tasks, including video editing, image generation, VFX, and other creative functions.
What is the Retake tool and how does it work?
-The Retake tool by LTX allows users to modify dialogue in a video after it has been filmed. You can upload your video, select a portion to edit, and then input a prompt to change the dialogue in that scene. The tool can even replace or add new audio, creating realistic changes.
Which AI tool performed better in following a detailed prompt for generating images?
-Nano Banana Pro performed better in following the detailed prompt, generating images that closely adhered to the given instructions, while Flux 2 showed more creativity but did not follow the prompt as accurately.
What was the result of the VFX test involving fire effects?
-Both Nano Banana Pro and Flux 2 did a good job with the VFX shot of a man’s arms on fire. The reviewer considered it a draw, as both tools effectively applied the fire effect, though personal visual style preferences might vary.
How did Nano Banana Pro and Flux 2 compare inJSON code correction creating realistic skin textures?
-Nano Banana Pro created more natural and realistic skin textures with a more subtle and accurate portrayal, while Flux 2 overemphasized the freckles, making the texture look slightly less realistic.
Which AI tool had better results with infographics?
-Both Nano Banana Pro and Flux 2 were able to create infographics effectively. However, Nano Banana Pro had fewer text errors, giving it an edge in this area.
How did the tools perform in generating text and handling text errors?
-Both tools struggled with text rendering, especially when generating magazine covers. Flux 2 had some issues with nonsensical text, while Nano Banana Pro generated more text but still had some errors. Users can fix these by re-uploading the images to LTX and asking for corrections.
What were the results in terms of handling consistency with characters in scenes?
-Both tools handled consistency very well when testing a character with unique identifiers like a silver streak in her hair and a scar. They both managed to maintain the character’s appearance across different scenes, such as sitting in a cafe or walking through a forest.
Which AI tool was better at solving problems with image editing, such as reconstructing ripped paper?
-Nano Banana Pro outperformed Flux 2 in solving the problem of reconstructing ripped paper. While Flux 2 did a decent job, it struggled with text accuracy, whereas Nano Banana Pro completed the task with greater precision.
What was the outcome when testing how well the tools handled YouTube thumbnail creation?
-Nano Banana Pro created more visually striking YouTube thumbnails with punchier colors and contrast. The reviewer preferred these thumbnails over the ones created by Flux 2 AI, which were considered less dynamic.
Outlines
🎬 Testing Flux 2 vs. Nano Banana Pro: AI Video Editing Tools
The video begins by introducing the comparison between Flux 2 and Nano Banana Pro, two powerful AI video editing tools. The host demonstrates an AI tool called Retake by LTX, which allows users to change dialogue after filming by uploading a video and specifying edits. The tool is tested with a scene where the dialogue is changed to 'I forgot my lines' and 'Cut, take two'. The host highlights the fun of using this tool and encourages viewers to try it out. The video then transitions to the main test: comparing Flux 2 and Nano Banana Pro's ability to work with multi-reference prompts, followed by image generation results for detailed instructions. The segment highlights the impressive results of Nano Banana Pro's performance.
🖼️ Comparing Flux 2 and Nano Banana Pro for Multi-Reference and VFX
The video continues with a detailed comparison of Flux 2 and Nano Banana Pro's ability to handle multi-reference prompts. The host created a detailed image prompt and tested both tools to see how well they followed complex instructions. Nano Banana Pro performed better, closely adhering to the detailed prompt, while Flux 2's results were more dynamic but less precise. The segment also covers VFX testing, where both tools were asked to make a man's arms appear on fire. Both tools performed well, but Nano Banana Pro was consideredCorrect JSON code slightly better. The host then demonstrates how to blend VFX shots with original footage using video editing software.
🔥 Evaluating Photo Realism, Effects, and ConsistencyTesting AI tools
This part of the video focuses on how Flux 2 and Nano Banana Pro handle photo realism and effects. The host tests both tools by generating realistic close-ups of skin, with Nano Banana Pro winning for its more natural and realistic look. The tools are also tested on adding effects like sunny weather and snow to a Jurassic Park scene. Both tools perform admirably, but Flux 2 had the edge in maintaining scene consistency. The video then moves on to testing consistency in character generation, where both tools succeeded in maintaining character traits across various scenes.
📋 Text Rendering, Problem Solving, and YouTube Thumbnails
The video moves on to testing text rendering capabilities in Flux 2 and Nano Banana Pro. The host shows examples where Flux 2's text generation contained errors, while Nano Banana Pro performed slightly better, though both tools had room for improvement. Next, the host tests both tools with a paper reconstruction problem, where Nano Banana Pro clearly outperformed Flux 2. The host also tests the tools by generating YouTube thumbnails, with Nano Banana Pro producing more engaging, colorful designs. The segment concludes with a test on camera lens styles, where both tools performed well with varying lens effects.
🧑💻 Testing Blur Removal, Infographics, and Language Handling
In this segment, the host tests how Flux 2 and Nano Banana Pro handle deblurring images, with both tools performing impressively, though Flux 2 edges out slightly in this category. The host also tests both tools on creating infographics, with Nano Banana Pro having a slight advantage due to fewer text errors. Language capabilities are then tested by asking the tools to generate text in Thai, with Nano Banana Pro winning for accuracy in translation. The video demonstrates how both tools handle complex requests with varying results.
💡 Image Editing: Adding and Removing Elements
The final segment tests how well Flux 2 and Nano Banana Pro handle the addition and removal of elements from images. The host asks both tools to remove bottles from people's hands in a photo, and Nano Banana Pro performs better, with fewer issues than Flux 2. The host then tests adding a white vest to a scene from Jurassic Park, where Nano Banana Pro consistently produced the desired result across multiple generations. Flux 2, while capable, showed some inconsistencies. The segment ends with the host concluding that both tools are highly capable, but Nano Banana Pro edges out in some areas.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Nano Banana Pro
💡Flux 2
💡LTX Retake
💡Multi-reference images
💡VFX (Visual Effects)
💡Photo realism
💡Text rendering
💡Problem solving (Image reconstruction)
💡Infographics
Highlights
Introduction to a head-to-head comparison of Nano Banana Pro vs FLUX 2 image models.
Demo of Retake by LTX, an AI tool that can change spoken dialogue in existing video footage.
Showcase of Retake's ability to rephrase lines and generate off-screen dialogue seamlessly.
Multi-reference test using 25 compiled images and a highly detailed action prompt.
Nano Banana Pro follows complex multi-reference instructions with near-perfect accuracy.
FLUX 2 produces more dynamic visuals but fails to follow detailed instructions precisely.
Both models perform well at blending multiple reference images into a single composition.
VFX tests show both models handle fire effects convincingly, resulting in a tie.
Nano Banana Pro produces more natural, realistic skin texture in extreme close-ups.
FLUX 2 excels in weather-change edits—especially sunny and snowy conversions—while maintaining scene structure.
Both models show strong consistency when generating the same character across different scenes.
Text-rendering tests show both models struggle slightly, but LTX can fix errors via re-uploads.
Nano Banana Pro solves ripped-paper reconstruction prompts more accurately than FLUX 2.
For YouTube thumbnails, Nano Banana Pro creates punchier, more colorful designs.
Lens-styleNano Banana Pro vs Flux 2 tests (telephoto, wide-angle, tilt-shift) show strong results from both, with Nano Banana Pro preferred for wide-angle realism.
FLUX 2 performs slightly better in deblurring images, closely matching the original sharp source.
Both models generate high-quality infographics, with Nano Banana Pro showing fewer text inaccuracies.
Language test (Thai text on cardboard) shows Nano Banana Pro achieves more accurate translation and writing.
Object removal tests show Nano Banana Pro removing items cleanly with higher consistency.
Clothing-addition test on a Jurassic Park frame demonstrates Nano Banana Pro’s superior accuracy across multiple generations.
Conclusion emphasizes that both tools are excellent, and users benefit from having multiple high-quality options.